Doodle Bug (minikin) wrote,
Doodle Bug
minikin

  • Mood:

cryptic logic

assume a > b > c

X believes b to be insufficient. Y believes this is be a false observation based on comparison with a.

How can Y argue X must believe c be sufficient?


Oh, that's right. sufficiency is subjective, therefore if Y believes to be sufficient, then X should accept this.

Um,

why is it that the "more, more, more. there is never enough" argument is always used by those unwilling to try the first "more" ? "here, make do with less."

stuff it all.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments